Corporate Finance Newsletter

Charles Russell Corporate Finance Group
Click here for more information
>>more>>


Back to Corporate Finance Newsletter Index to view past copies
>>more>>


October 2006 Articles
1. AIM Rules - Depositary Receipts, IAS, proposed AIM Rules for Companies and AIM Rules for Nomads >>more>>
2. Changes to the Combined Code >>more>>
3. Prospectus Regulation - Proposed Amendments in relation to Historical Financial Information >>more>>
4. Takeover Code - Standstill Agreements >>more>>
5. Proposed Amendments to the Prospectus and Listing Rules >>more>>

 

 

3 PROSPECTUS REGULATION - PROPOSED AMENDMENTS IN RELATION TO HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

3.1 Introduction
The Prospectus Regulation 809/2004 concerns minimum disclosure requirements for issuers to enable investors to make an informed judgement on the issuer's financial status. In particular Item 20.1 of Annex 1 to the Regulation states "audited historical information covering the latest 3 financial years (or such shorter period that the issuer has been in operation), and the audit report in respect of each year" must be included in a prospectus.
This requirement presents a problem where an issuer has a complex financial history. For example, where the issuer has made a significant acquisition not yet reflected in its own financial statements or where the issuer is a newly incorporated holding company, in order to provide accurate historical financial information it is sometimes necessary to include financial information produced by another entity.

On 10 August 2006, the Commission published a draft regulation to amend the Prospectus Regulation, with a view to rectifying the apparent deficiency in the Item 20.1 requirement in situations such as those outlined above. The proposed amendments will enable competent authorities to require issuers which have a complex financial history to provide financial information relating to entities or business undertakings which, when that information was drawn up, were legally separate from the issuer but which will form part of its business at the time of publication of the prospectus.

3.2 Proposals
Where the issuer of a security requiring a share registration document has a 'complex financial history' or has made a 'significant financial commitment', and consequently the inclusion in the registration document of certain items of financial information relating to an entity other than the issuer is necessary in order to satisfy the obligation laid down in Article 5(1) of Directive 2003/71/EC, the competent authority of the home Member State must require that this information is included in the registration document.

An issuer is regarded as having a complex financial history if:

- it was formed during the three year period immediately preceding the date of filing of the prospectus, and information relating to its business undertaking at that date is included in financial information relating to another entity;
- it has completed one or more transactions which, individually or taken together, give rise to a significant gross change which is not included in the historical financial information that the issuer is required to provide under item 20.1 of Annex 1.

A significant financial commitment is defined as where the issuer has entered into a binding agreement to undertake a transaction which, on completion, is likely to give rise to a significant gross change. A conditional agreement will be treated as binding if it is reasonably certain that those conditions will be fulfilled.

An agreement shall be treated as binding where it is conditional on the offer of securities that are the subject of the prospectus or, in the case of a proposed hostile takeover, if the offer of securities that are the subject matter of the prospectus has the objective of funding that takeover.

A significant gross change is defined as a variation of more than 25%, relative to one or more indicators of the size of the issuer's business, in the situation of an issuer, with the exception of those situations where merger accounting is required.

These draft proposals anticipate unusual situations. It is not therefore possible to specify the information needed for every conceivable case. Instead it will be a question of fact in each case what is necessary to ensure that the investor receives the information he requires to make an investment decision. However, the competent authority should only require information that is proportionate for the issuer to compile.

The competent authority shall base any request for further information on the requirements set out in item 20.1 of Annex I as regards the content of financial information and the applicable accounting and auditing principles, subject to any modification which is appropriate in view of the following factors:

- the nature and range of information already included in the prospectus, and the existence of financial information relating to an entity other than the issuer in a form that might be included in a prospectus without modification;
- the facts of the case, including the economic substance of the transactions by which the issuer has acquired or disposed of its business undertaking or any part of it, and the specific nature of that undertaking; and
- the ability of the issuer to obtain financial information relating to another entity with reasonable effort.

In each case where the obligation laid down in the Article 5(1) of Directive 2003/71/EC may be satisfied in more ways than one, the least onerous method should be implemented.

The proposals include a proposed technical amendment to Item 20.1 of Annex I to clarify the historical financial information which must be included in a prospectus where the issuer has changed its accounting reference date during the three year period for which such information is required. To this end, the following sentence is to be inserted:

"If the issuer has changed its accounting reference date during the period for which historical financial information is required, the audited historical information shall cover at least 36 months, or the entire period for which the issuer has been in operation, whichever is shorter."


If you require further information on any matter covered in this note, please contact your principal contact at Charles Russell or Simon Gilbert, Clive Hopewell or Alexander Keepin (London), Francis Rundall, Richard Norton, or Adrian Mayer (Cheltenham), Catherine Drew or Geoff Sparks (Guildford) or Peter Elliott (Oxford) on 0207 203 5000.

To download these articles in pdf format, please click here


Please note that the summaries above are a general indicative guide only. They are not exhaustive. This information has been prepared by the firm as a service to our clients. As it is a general guide, we recommend that you seek professional advice before taking action. No liability can be accepted by the firm for any action taken or not taken as a result of this information. The firm is not authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 but we are able in certain circumstances to offer a limited range of investment services to clients because we are members of the Law Society. We can provide these investment services if they are an incidental part of the professional services we have been engaged to provide.