|
Super
Chem Products Llt v American Life & General Insurance Co Ltd &
Others (2004)
Privy Council
[2004] UK PC2
Lords
Bingham, Steyn, Hope, Rodger and Sir Kenneth Keith
January
2004
|
 |
| Contract
law cannot and does not prevent an insurer from resisting a claim on alternative
bases, one involving an allegation of fraud and the other breaches of
policy conditions. An insurer need not choose between alleging fraud,
thereby abandoning the right to invoke other conditions of the policy,
and relying on those provisions, thereby giving up the right to allege
fraud.
The Claimant
insured, Super Chem, appealed from the decision of the Court of Appeal
of Trinidad & Tobago which dismissed its claims against the Defendant
insurer, American Life, for sums due under two insurance policies. American
Life alleged that Super Chem's two actions had been commenced out of
the time prescribed in the policies, that the fire was caused by the
arson of Super Chem or with its complicity and that Super Chem had breached
the claims co-operation provision in each of the policies.
In support of its case, Super Chem relied on Viscount Haldane's opinion
in Jureidini v National British & Irish Millers Insurance Co Ltd
(1915) AC 499, to the effect that by alleging fraud an insurer was thereby
giving up the right to invoke other conditions of the policy. In other
words that American Life, by alleging fraud, had lost the right to rely
on any breach of the claims provisions.
It was
held that, properly understood, American Life's defence of arson was
not a repudiation of the contract but a defence based on the contract.
It had not accepted any repudiatory breach as terminating the contract.
Arguments based on Jureidini had to be rejected. It was stated, in terms,
that Viscount Haldane's observations do not represent good law. The
Court of Appeal held that contract law cannot and does not prevent an
insurer from resisting a claim on alternative bases, when involving
an allegation of fraud and the other breaches of policy conditions.
It would be contrary to principle and business common-sense, which underpin
English commercial law, to require an insurer to choose between alleging
fraud, thereby abandoning the right to invoke other conditions of the
policy, or to rely on those provisions, thereby giving up the right
to allege fraud. It was held that Viscount Haldane's statement in Jureidini
has "bedevilled our commercial law for too long".
|